That is why most people are really mad about Diablo Immortal and not so much about HS. Then look at DI, you simply cannot compete with not spending. But as I then played only arena there was no point of using them on anything. When I actively played, I had so much gold and dust ready for each expansion that I didn't need to buy anything with money if I wanted. Not saying that it wouldn't take $100 or so for a new player to catch up. You can have fun and competitive games in HS without ever spending. One of the cards requires lv27 for instance. And in about 100 mins I had the entire deck except the ones you have to level for. I went ahead and switched to the asian server to see how long it would take me to get the cards from packs without crafting. So no, Hearthstone has almost always had a new player friendly deck that you can play. And then almost half of the rest of the deck is free to new players in the core set. The only legendary in the deck is given to new players for free, and 2 of the 4 epics are given for free. Right now HSReplay, a site that records games, decks and winrates, has a shammy deck that, for a new player, would cost less than 1000 dust with a recorded 59.4% winrate over almost 7,000 games. This trend on a budget friendly deck being pretty good has continued. Back when the game first came out it was aggro all the time, The decks would either run 0 or 1 legendary in Leeroy Jenkins and otherwise be mostly common or rare cards. Hearthstone does NOT require a small fortune to craft a deck that is competitive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |